What the FCA’s Pensions Regulatory Priorities report means for pensions providers
Financial services operational and compliance leaders face a constant need to respond to relentless
Financial services operational and compliance leaders face a constant need to respond to relentless regulatory changes, manage complex remediation projects, and drive operational transformation – while controlling costs and mitigating risk.
The traditional approach has been to build large, permanent teams sized to handle changes and peaks in demand. This approach is quickly becoming a legacy model that creates competitive drag and strategic inflexibility.
Forward-thinking leaders are recognising that true resilience is not about fixed capacity but strategic flexibility. That’s why they’re adopting a deliberate 75/25 operating model, which embraces a core team of approximately 75% permanent staff and a 25% agile, on-demand capability. This approach should not be seen as a compromise; it’s an essential strategic adaptation that drives competitive advantage in fast-paced environments, enabling firms to scale expertise and delivery power precisely when needed.
The conventional wisdom of staffing for peak demand is often a strategic error that creates significant structural challenges. While intended to ensure a firm is always prepared, building a permanent team sized for the worst-case scenario introduces inefficiency and inflexibility. The key risks of this approach include:
By maintaining a leaner core team, businesses can avoid these structural inefficiencies and build a more adaptable cost base.
Adopting a 75/25 resourcing model is a conscious operating choice, not simply a contingency plan to fill unexpected gaps. It represents a fundamental mindset shift, viewing interim resources as a planned, agile component of the organisational structure, rather than a last-minute fix.
This model creates a powerful synergy: the 75% core provides organisational stability and institutional knowledge, while the 25% flexible layer provides the dynamic capability to seize opportunities and mitigate emergent risks. The core team of permanent staff deeply understands the business, its culture, and its risk frameworks, providing essential continuity. The 25% flexible capacity, in turn, provides the strategic advantage, allowing the firm to inject specialist skills and leadership at critical moments without carrying long-term overhead.
The real power of the 75/25 model lies in deploying interim leaders and specialist teams at moments of greatest impact. These roles are not needed on a permanent basis, but are operationally critical when required, enabling the specialist to engage and deliver value from day one. Areas of strategic interim expertise include:
"TCC delivered us a team of brilliant people. The tools and processes they created and the rapport they built with the internal team, have been fantastic. We couldn’t have delivered this programme without them."
Complaints Programme Director, National Advice Network
Successful implementation requires more than just a strategic decision; it demands a practical framework to integrate flexible resources seamlessly. To make the 75/25 model work, firms should follow a clear, structured approach:
In an environment of constant regulatory evolution and operational change, the most resilient organisations are those that can scale leadership, expertise and delivery at speed, without locking in unnecessary fixed costs and engaging in lengthy recruitment cycles. The traditional staffing model for peak capacity is a legacy approach that creates competitive drag and strategic inflexibility.
Operating with 75% fixed capacity and 25% agile interim resourcing provides the optimal blend of stability and responsiveness. This means firms can protect their core operational integrity while confidently deploying the right people with the right expertise at the right time – building a smarter, more resilient organisation.
Contact us to explore how agile interim resourcing can strengthen your operational resilience!
The financial services sector has been abuzz with a variety of pressing issues - from ongoing advice services, motor finance and Consumer Duty expectations, to the crucial role of technology for outcome evidencing.
