Finance Derivative: When should firms use on-demand financial crime expertise?

Recently featured in Finance Derivative, Joe Norburn, CEO, TCC Group and Momenta, explores when firms should consider on-demand financial crime expertise and how a flexible approach to specialist resourcing can help organisations respond to regulatory scrutiny, remediation, transformation and leadership gaps without unnecessarily increasing permanent headcount.  

Financial crime piggy bank

Recently featured in Finance Derivative, Joe Norburn examines the growing pressure on traditional financial crime resourcing models as firms contend with evolving threats, increasing regulatory expectations and the need to access specialist capability quickly.  

The article explores how firms can maintain a strong internal core while bringing in specialist expertise around specific risks, programmes or periods of increased scrutiny. This can include regulatory remediation, financial crime transformation, risk uplift, file reviews and supervisory response.  

A central message is that specialist resourcing should not simply be treated as a faster way to fill vacancies. Instead, firms should organise it around clearly defined regulatory and operational outcomes, supported by clear mandates, reporting lines and senior oversight.  

“For boards, the issue is not simply headcount. It is whether the organisation has enough accountable capability to maintain effective control, respond to emerging threats and deliver change without creating an inefficient cost base.” comments Joe Norburn, CEO, TCC Group and Momenta 

Facing financial crime: When should firms use on-demand financial crime expertise? explains when this approach can add value and how firms can scale financial crime capability while retaining control and accountability.

Read the full article in Finance Derivative 

Supporting sources

  1. Facing financial crime: When should firms use on-demand financial crime expertise?

Frequently asked questions

When should firms consider on-demand financial crime expertise?

Firms should consider specialist support when a material, time-bound risk or delivery requirement goes beyond their available internal capacity. The article identifies regulatory engagement, remediation backlogs, control failures, transformation programmes, leadership gaps, rapid growth and the need for independent challenge as typical triggers.  

Where can specialist financial crime teams provide support?

The article highlights AML and KYC remediation, transaction-monitoring transformation, customer-file and data-quality reviews, regulatory response, financial crime transformation and risk uplift as areas where specialist capability can be deployed.  

How can firms retain control when using specialist support?

The article stresses the importance of defining the mandate, reporting lines, responsibilities, intended outcomes and exit plan before specialist support is deployed. Accountability should remain within the firm’s governance structure.  

Reviewed by TCC Group Editorial Team

Need specialist financial crime expertise?

TCC’s specialist resourcing model can help firms access experienced capability around specific financial crime risks, programmes and periods of regulatory scrutiny, while maintaining clear governance and accountability. 

Talk to TCC about your financial crime resourcing requirements.

Ready to strengthen your compliance?

Speak to our experts about your regulatory challenges.