Fragmented controls raise financial crime risk for firms

TCC Group’s CEO Joe Norburn explains why fragmented financial crime controls are becoming a system-wide risk, and why firms need enterprise-wide oversight rather than siloed processes.

Financial-crime-TCC

What happened?

Speaking to Business & Accountancy Daily, Joe Norburn, CEO at TCC Group, explains that financial crime is no longer a discrete compliance issue but a system-wide risk that shapes a firm’s resilience and trust.

He notes that as fraud, scams and money laundering become more interconnected, many firms are still responding through fragmented operating models, with responsibility split across separate teams, systems and data.

Why does it matter?

Joe highlights that this fragmentation is itself a risk, creating gaps in visibility, weakening controls and slowing firms’ ability to respond to emerging threats.

With the FCA emphasising collective defence, the Consumer Duty and outcome-focused regulation, firms are expected to move beyond siloed controls and demonstrate clear, enterprise-wide oversight of financial crime risk.

“Financial crime is no longer just a function to manage, but a system-wide discipline that shapes resilience, trust and long-term competitiveness”.

Supporting sources

  1. Fragmented controls raise financial crime risk for firms

Frequently asked questions

Why does fragmentation increase financial crime risk?

Joe Norburn explains that fragmented operating models create gaps in visibility, weaken controls and slow firms’ ability to respond, turning fragmentation itself into a risk.

What does the FCA expect from firms?

With its focus on collective defence, the Consumer Duty and outcome-focused regulation, the FCA expects firms to move beyond siloed controls and demonstrate enterprise-wide oversight.

Reviewed by Joe Norburn, CEO – TCC Group

Ready to strengthen your compliance?

Speak to our experts about your regulatory challenges.